tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38696983.post4335862894364183624..comments2024-01-26T00:51:41.975-08:00Comments on AnceStories: The Stories of My Ancestors: Research Log: MIDKIFFs in the 1920 CensusMiriam Robbinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12021845886261585678noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38696983.post-52144758146377370582008-01-20T11:33:00.000-08:002008-01-20T11:33:00.000-08:00Randy, I really appreciate your time and effort in...Randy, I really appreciate your time and effort into helping me out! I am 99% sure this family simply wasn't enumerated, but then I've thought the same thing about other families that I later found in censuses! I'm just trying to cover all the bases!<BR/><BR/>Thank you for your comment.Miriam Robbinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12021845886261585678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38696983.post-46725047472920535612007-12-30T21:47:00.000-08:002007-12-30T21:47:00.000-08:00Miriam,I played around with this for about 30 minu...Miriam,<BR/><BR/>I played around with this for about 30 minutes tonight using the kid's names (using wild cards), birth years +/- 2, birthplace, plus parents names and birthplaces - all in a seemingly random search process -- and came up with nothing remotely close to this family. If they were using their first names, then they are most likely not enumerated. <BR/><BR/>My Seaver research showed that about 10% were not enumerated in each census - some even if they were in the same address in the census years before and after (e.g., there in 1910, not there in 1920, there in 1930). Just the way it is, I fear.<BR/><BR/>RandyRandy Seaverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17477703429102065294noreply@blogger.com